Discussion:  Criteria for
Pony /Horse of the Year Awards

Ronaele Carpenter, March 13, 2009

Registries:  AMHR, ASPC, ASPR, NSPR

Areas:   Halter & Performance

 

1.     Purpose of this Document

1.1            Goal

To discuss new criteria for the selection of Pony/Horse of the Year (POY/HOY) for all registries under ASPC/AMHR.

1.2            Objectives

·         Establish objective criteria that is not subject to committee review and approval

·         Establish an easier method of calculating POY/HOY points

·         Enable owners to track POY/HOY status on line

·         Reward “all-around” or horses and ponies who show in multiple divisions (open, youth, amateur)

·         Reward performance ponies who show in classes other than (just) driving.

2.     Current Criteria

2.1            Rulebook Reference

Rulebook of the American Shetland Pony, American Miniature Horse Registry, American Show Pony Registry, National Show Pony Registry, 2008 Version
Section XII National Shows, Award Programs, Awards & Incentives
Part 5 The Modern, Modern Pleasure Pony, Classic, Show Pony and Miniature Horse of the Year in Halter and Performance.

2.2            Rulebook: Purpose & Method

Part 5 – The Modern, Modern Pleasure Pony, Classic, Show Pony and Miniature Horse of the Year in Halter and Performance

A. Purpose: (1) To honor the top pony or horse showing the halter division and the top animal in the performance section of each division of the Modern, Classic, and Miniature Horse. (2) A single animal will be honored in both the Pleasure Pony and Show Pony Division by combining the halter and performance section of these divisions.

B. Method: (1) All-Star points divided by (2) number of shows shown at times (3) number of different Judges divided by (2) number of shows shown at times (4) number of horses/ponies beat divided by (2) number of shows shown at times (5) number of Grand Champions divided by (2) number of shows shown at.

C. The final results will be reviewed by a committee which shall be appointed by the president and should consist of members from registry administration and the breed committees.

2.3            Registries & Divisions

Note: Each division, except NSPR, offers two awards:  Halter and Performance

·         AMHR “Under”

·         AMHR “Over”

·         Foundation
Classic

·         Modern Pleasure

·         Modern

·         ASPR

·         NSPR (performance only)

3.     Option 1:  Use Hall of Fame Points

3.1   Does this method meet all objectives?

1.      Establish objective criteria that is not subject to committee review and approval
YES.  This method meets this criteria, except that a means of resolving ties would need to be established.

2.      Establish an easier method of calculating POY/HOY points

YES.  This method would be much easier than the current method. 

3.      Enable owners to track POY/HOY status on line.

NO.  HOF points can be tracked on line, but there is no cumulative list for comparing HOF points between horses/ponies as there is for All-Star points.  Either a system change would need to be made, or owners would need to pull up HOF information on every competitor individually to see their standing.

4.      Reward “all-around” or horses and ponies who show in multiple divisions (open, youth, amateur)

NO.  This does not meet this criteria as no HOF points are only given for the “Open” division in halter.

5.      Reward performance ponies who show in classes other than (just) driving.

NO.   Many performance classes do not receive HOF points.  Shetlands receive HOF points only in driving classes.

3.2   Other Considerations:  Competition

Hall of Fame does reward in part based on the number of entries in the class, but it is not consistent.  Here is an example:

·         Pony A wins first in an open halter class where it is the only entry receives 1 point.

·         Pony B wins second place in an open halter class where there are 3 entries.  Pony B beat more ponies than Pony A, and yet Pony A gets points, where Pony B does not.

 

Conclusion:  HOF does not consistently reward horses/ponies who win against competition.  A horse/pony can win over other horses and receive no points, where a horse/pony who is the only entry in a class does receive points.

4.     Option 2:  Use All-Star Points

4.1   Does this method meet all objectives?

1.      Establish objective criteria that is not subject to committee review and approval
YES.  This method meets this criteria, except that a means of resolving ties would need to be established.

2.      Establish an easier method of calculating POY/HOY points

YES.  This method would be much easier than the current method.  However, because the ASPC/AMHR website posts All-Star points by class, and not by All Star division, owners will have to do some calculations themselves.  Never the less, (almost) all information needed to do the calculations is contained in the on-line Results and owners would only have to add up scores, not use a complicated formula, to keep track of their POY/HOY points.  

3.      Enable owners to track POY/HOY status on line.

YES.  See above.  Points are available on line.

4.      Reward “all-around” or horses and ponies who show in multiple divisions (open, youth, amateur)

YES.  All-Star points are tracked for all classes and therefore available for POY/HOY Awards.

5.      Reward performance ponies who show in classes other than (just) driving.

YES.  Unlike HOF points, All-Star points are tracked for all performance classes and therefore available for POY/HOY Awards.

Concern:  There are no stake classes for some performance classes, and thereby giving performance horses and ponies show in driving, hunter, and jumper and advantage over horses who show in liberty,  halter obstacle, driving obstacle, versatility, etc.

4.2   Other Considerations:  Competition

All Star Points are rewarded based on the horse’s/pony’s placing, and not based on the number of competitors that horse/pony won over.  For example, a pony who wins third place in halter at an “A” show is awarded 15 points, regardless if whether there were 3 or 33 in the class.  Likewise, a pony who wins a halter class is awarded 30, even if it is the only entry.

Conclusion:  While All Stars does not take number of entries into consideration, it is consistent in the way that it awards points.

5.     Final Recommendation (FIRST DRAFT!)

5.1   Amendment to Rulebook

Part 5 – The Modern, Modern Pleasure Pony, Classic, Show Pony and Miniature Horse of the Year in Halter and Performance

A. Purpose: (1) To  honor the top halter show pony or horse and the top performance show pony or horse in the following divisions: Foundation, Classic, Modern Pleasure, Modern, American Show Pony, National Show Pony, Miniature Horse “Under” and Miniature Horse “Over”. 

B. Method:  Every All Star point earned in any class (Open, Amateur, Youth, etc) during the current competition year will count towards either the Halter Pony/Horse of the Year or the Performance Pony/Horse of the Year Award.  Halter Horse/Pony of the Year will be awarded to the Horse/Pony who earned the greatest total number of All-Star points in all halter conformation classes.  Performance Horse/Pony of the Year will be awarded to the Horse/Pony who earned the greatest total number of All-Star points in all classes that do not count toward the Halter Horse/Pony of the Year. Where horses/ponies are allowed to cross-enter to another division because a specific class is not listed in the Rule Book, points from that class will be counted as if it had been earned in that horse’s/pony’s division.  For example, Foundation ponies can earn points towards the Foundation Pony of the Year by entering Classic Liberty because there is no Foundation Liberty class.  While points earned by Foundation ponies who compete in Classic Country Pleasure Driving will be credited only to the Classic Pony of the Year award, not Foundation Pony of the Year, because Foundation Country Pleasure Driving is an official class offering (even though it may be not offered at all shows).   Preliminary rankings for Pony/Horse of the Year will be posted on the Official website, and participants will be given a reasonable amount of time to submit corrections.

D. Method – Breaking Ties:  Ties will be broken in the following manner:

(1)  The pony/horse with the greater total All Star Points in “Grand” or “Stake” classes in their division will win.

(2)  If the tie still remains, the pony/horse earning the greater total number of Hall of Fame “Grands” against competition during the current competition year will win.

(3)  If the tie still remains, the committee representing the division where the tie exists (e.g. the Classic Committee) will set a quantifiable criteria for breaking the tie before examining the show record of the tied horses/ponies. (Examples of quantifiable criteria would be number of horses/ponies competed against, or number of judges shown under). An explanation of how the tie was broken will be published on the Official ASPC/AMHR website.

5.2   Open Questions

A few items that still need to be ironed out:

1.       What to do with Showmanship.  It is a performance class (if done right!), but points are earned by the owner, not the horse/pony.

2.      What to do with Color.  It is not a halter “conformation” class and therefore falls under.  Where does it count?  (I was trying to limit the exceptions to make this as easy as possible).

3.      While more objective than the current system, does this system just reward those with the money and time to go to more shows and enter more classes?

4.      Will people feel that stallions are at a disadvantage because they cannot participate in some classes (e.g. some youth classes)?

5.      A side benefit:  This might increase participation in classes that normally have few entries.